You are the G, the O, and the D

     "This happened, and next that happened...... following that is when it happened!"  Three separate events, in close proximity of each other when referring to the illusion of time as a method of measuring distance.  Three separate events?....?
     The scenario described is, of course, completely hypothetical, but no doubt a common way of describing the action or sequence of actions some-ONE may use or have used to explain something.  I find it interesting that 1,2,3,5,8,13 "separate" happenings are used to describe one event, or result. Lets take a step back, one action=one result.
     There is no time involved, its just an idea, a theory, an instrument, if you will, to measure time. Well that being the case, who has calibrated this instrument!?! A measurement can only be as accurate as the tool used to measure is calibrated.  Consider a rule of 12"(rule A), there are separate and equally spaced increments marked for designating distance on a linear physical plane.  Half-way = 6" according to this rule. Now lets take another rule(rule B), next to rule A, it "measure" 6".  However, rule B also has equally spaced increments, and according to the labeled numbers on it, rule B also has a total length of 12"
     Which is correct?......... If I were to draw an illustration or take a picture of the two rules, you still wouldn't be able to perceive which is "correct" by the standard set by our conditioning. Either one could "accurate", or they could both be in-"accurate".  You decide which will "work" for you, take two separate photos of each rule put them next to each other any you may not be able to distinguish which is rule A or rule B.
     Does it really matter to acknowledge a difference? I don't believe so, because it's all the same thing.  The measurement of time is no different than the example of the rule previously described.  EXCEPT! that the individual can refer to the Sun and the Moon as calibration standard.  But even that is still within the constraints of the mind of the perceiver.
     Everything has already happened, everything is happening, everything will happen.  To me these hold the exact same meaning when you cast the illusion of time aside.  Perhaps, in my opinion, the best way to describe the aforementioned "happened, happening, happen" is to say "Every-Thing happens". So there are no separate occurrences that lead to an end or final happening or finish. Everything IS, until you begin measuring.  Please realize that you are the action and result, and that IS the only action and the only result, a simple equation, "action=result", they are the same thing. Even more so, EVERY-thing is ONE. You are that ONE, it's an undeniable truth once dis-covered.